Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, Frank
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Neil J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-07T12:04:13Z
dc.date.available2019-06-07T12:04:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citationMcDermott F & Smart NJ (2019). Intersphincteric resection: indications and outcome. In: Comprehensive Rectal Cancer Care. London: Springeren_US
dc.identifier.isbn9783319989013
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-98902-0_13
dc.identifier.urihttps://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/123456789/621033
dc.description.abstractDespite advances in the management of rectal cancer, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment with curative intent. The major advance in rectal cancer care was the standardization of surgical technique, total mesorectal excision, along with pathological reporting of the excised specimen that led to reductions in local recurrence and improved survival [1–3]. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APR) was once the only option for low tumors but sphincter-preserving surgery is now commonly performed. Despite these options there exists a wide variability in the proportion of patients with rectal tumors that undergo APR (12–51%) [4–6]. The improvements in neoadjuvant therapy have led to better down staging of tumors and in some cases pathological complete response (pCR) [7]. This allows previously inoperable tumors to undergo surgical management or perform less invasive procedures such as local excision or sphincter-preserving surgery.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-98902-0_13en_US
dc.subjectWessex Classification Subject Headings::Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleIntersphincteric resection: indications and outcome.en_US
dc.title.alternativeComprehensive Rectal Cancer Careen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.type.versionPublisheden_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record