Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged over 65 years : a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and complications
Burden, E. G.
Evans, J. P.
JournalThe bone & joint journal
PublisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Journal
Rights© 2022 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
MetadataShow full item record
AIMS: Arthroplasty is being increasingly used for the management of distal humeral fractures (DHFs) in elderly patients. Arthroplasty options include total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA); both have unique complications and there is not yet a consensus on which implant is superior. This systematic review asked: in patients aged over 65 years with unreconstructable DHFs, what differences are there in outcomes, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), and complications, between distal humeral HA and TEA? METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on PROMs, ROM, and complications. PROMs and ROM results were reported descriptively and a meta-analysis of complications was conducted. Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde's non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021228329). RESULTS: A total of 29 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score was 19.6 (SD 7.5) for HA and 38 (SD 11.9) for TEA and the mean abbreviated version of DASH was 17.2 (SD 13.2) for HA and 24.9 (SD 4.8) for TEA. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was the most commonly reported PROM across included studies, with a mean of 87 (SD 5.3) in HA and 88.3 (SD 5) in TEA. High complication rates were seen in both HA (22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5 to 44)) and TEA (21% (95% CI 13 to 30), but no statistically significant difference identified. CONCLUSION: This systematic review has indicated PROMs and ROM mostly favouring HA, but with a similarly high complication rate in the two procedures. However, due to the small sample size and heterogeneity between studies, strength of evidence for these findings is low. We propose further research in the form of a national randomized controlled trial. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):559-566.
CitationBone Joint J. 2022 May;104-B(5):559-566. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B5.BJJ-2021-1207.R2.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Triceps on approach for total elbow arthroplasty: worth preserving? A review of approaches for total elbow arthroplasty. Booker, Simon; Smith, Christopher D. (Sage, 2017-04)Total elbow arthroplasty can be a rewarding operation and is becoming increasingly used in the elderly fracture population. Multiple approaches are represented in the literature and deciding on the best approach is difficult. ...
Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children Appelboam, A.; Reuben, A. D.; Benger, J. R.; Beech, F.; Dutson, J.; Haig, S.; Higginson, I.; Klein, J. A.; Le Roux, S.; Saranga, S. S.; Taylor, R.; Vickery, J.; Powell, R. J.; Lloyd, G. (BMJ, 2008-12-09)OBJECTIVE: To determine whether full elbow extension as assessed by the elbow extension test can be used in routine clinical practice to rule out bony injury in patients presenting with elbow injury. DESIGN: Adults: ...
Vibration therapy versus standard treatment for tennis elbow: A randomized controlled study. Furness, Nicholas Duncan; Phillips, A.; Gallacher, Sian; Beazley, J. C. S.; Evans, Jonathan Peter; Toms, Andrew; Thomas, William; Smith, Christopher D. (Sage, 2018-08-15)To determine whether a mechanical, high-frequency vibration device (Tenease™) can improve pain and function for the treatment of tennis elbow (TE), compared with standard treatment.