Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSebastian, S.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, K. V.
dc.contributor.authorSegal, J. P.
dc.contributor.authorSubramanian, S.
dc.contributor.authorConley, T. E.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, H. A.
dc.contributor.authorKent, A. J.
dc.contributor.authorSaifuddin, A.
dc.contributor.authorHicks, L.
dc.contributor.authorMehta, S.
dc.contributor.authorBhala, N.
dc.contributor.authorBrookes, M. J.
dc.contributor.authorLamb, C. A.
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, N. A.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, G. J.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-21T09:41:51Z
dc.date.available2022-04-21T09:41:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;9(1):e000763. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000763.
dc.identifier.pmid35101886
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000763
dc.identifier.urihttps://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/11287/622468
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) traditionally requires inpatient hospital management for intravenous therapies and/or colectomy. Ambulatory ASUC care has not yet been evaluated in large cohorts. AIMS: We used data from PROTECT, a UK multicentre observational COVID-19 inflammatory bowel disease study, to report the extent, safety and effectiveness of ASUC ambulatory pathways. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years old) meeting Truelove and Witts criteria between 1 January 2019-1 June 2019 and 1 March 2020-30 June 2020 were recruited to PROTECT. We used demographic, disease phenotype, treatment outcomes and 3-month follow-up data. Primary outcome was rate of colectomy during the index ASUC episode. Secondary outcomes included corticosteroid response, time to and rate of rescue or primary induction therapy, response to rescue or primary induction therapy, time to colectomy, mortality, duration of inpatient treatment and hospital readmission and colectomy within 3 months of index flare. We compared outcomes in three cohorts: (1) patients treated entirely in inpatient setting; ambulatory patients subdivided into; (2) patients managed as ambulatory from diagnosis and (3) patients hospitalised and subsequently discharged to ambulatory care for continued intravenous steroids. RESULTS: 37% (22/60) participating hospitals used ambulatory pathways. Of 764 eligible patients, 695 (91%) patients received entirely inpatient care, 15 (2%) patients were managed as ambulatory from diagnosis and 54 (7%) patients were discharged to ambulatory pathways. Aside from younger age in patients treated as ambulatory from diagnosis, no significant differences in disease or patient phenotype were observed. The rate of colectomy (15.0% (104/695) vs 13.3% (2/15) vs 13.0% (7/54), respectively, p=0.96) and secondary outcomes were similar among all three cohorts. Stool culture and flexible sigmoidoscopy were less frequently performed in ambulatory cohorts. Forty per cent of patients treated as ambulatory from diagnosis required subsequent hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: In a post hoc analysis of one of the largest ASUC cohorts collected to date, we report an emerging UK ambulatory practice which challenges treatment paradigms. However, our analysis remains underpowered to detect key outcome measures and further studies exploring clinical and cost-effectiveness as well as patient and physician acceptability are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04411784.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.urlhttps://bmjopengastro.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=35101886
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care
dc.subject*covid-19
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subject*Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis/epidemiology/therapy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInpatients
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom/epidemiology
dc.subject*IBD clinical
dc.subject*health service research
dc.subject*inflammatory bowel disease
dc.subject*surgery for IBD
dc.subject*ulcerative colitis
dc.subjectPharma
dc.titleAmbulatory care management of 69 patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis in comparison to 695 inpatients: insights from a multicentre UK cohort study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.journalBMJ open gastroenterology
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8804638
dc.description.noteThe article is available via Open Access. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text.
dc.type.versionppublish
dc.description.admin-notePublished version, accepted version, submitted version
dc.date.epub2022-02-02
dc.citation.volume9
dc.citation.issue1


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.