• Login
    View Item 
    •   RD&E Research Repository Home
    • All RD&E publications by year
    • 2022 RD&E publications
    • View Item
    •   RD&E Research Repository Home
    • All RD&E publications by year
    • 2022 RD&E publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Standardization of ileoanal J-pouch surgery technique: Quality assessment of minimally invasive ileoanal J-pouch surgery videos

    Thumbnail
    URI
    https://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/11287/622394
    Author
    Celentano, V.
    Tekkis, P.
    Nordenvall, C.
    Mills, S.
    Spinelli, A.
    Smart, N.
    Selvaggi, F.
    Warren, O.
    Espin-Basany, E.
    Kontovounisios, C.
    Pellino, G.
    Warusavitarne, J.
    Hancock, L.
    Myelid, P.
    Remzi, F.
    Date
    2021-12-31
    Journal
    Surgery
    Type
    Journal Article
    Publisher
    Elsevier
    DOI
    10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.032
    Rights
    Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is a complex procedure associated with significant morbidity, with several complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery leading to pouch failure. The aim of the study is to evaluate the heterogeneity surrounding the technique of ileoanal J-pouch surgery by assessing the safety and quality of published online peer-reviewed surgical videos. METHODS: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos published on peer-reviewed surgical journals and video channels were edited and anonymized to demonstrate specific steps of the surgical procedure: mobilization and division of the rectum, formation of the ileoanal J-pouch reservoir, anastomosis, and lengthening techniques. The anonymized videos were presented to a group of reviewers with expertise in ileal pouch anal anastomosis blinded to the names and affiliations of the surgeons performing the procedure. Primary outcome was the rate of interobserver variability in the assessment of specific technical steps of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery procedure. Secondary outcome was the appropriateness of the use of surgical videos review as an assessment tool for ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery, measured as rate of reviewers being unable to answer for poor video quality. RESULTS: In total, 29 video fragments were distributed, and 13 assessors completed a 60-item survey, organized in 7 major domains. The survey completion rate was 93.4%. Out of a total 729 answers, in 23 (3.2%) the reviewers indicated they were unable to comment due to poor video image, and in 48 (6.5%) were unable to comment due to the particular step not being shown in the procedure. The proportion of assessors rating rectal mobilization technically appropriate ranged from 30.7% to 92.3% and from 7.7% to 69.2% for safety. The level of rectal division was considered appropriate in 0 to 53.8% of the videos, whereas the stapling technique used for rectal division was appropriate in 0 to 70% of the videos. CONCLUSION: Our study assessed published peer-reviewed videos on ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery and reported heterogeneity in the safety of the demonstrated techniques. Blind assessment of published peer-reviewed ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos reported a high rate of unsafe or inappropriate technique for rectal mobilization and transection in the reviewed videos, with fair interobserver agreement among reviewers. There is a need for consensus on what is considered safe and appropriate in ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Peer review of ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery videos could facilitate training and accreditation in this complex procedure.
    Citation
    Surgery. 2021 Dec 31:S0039-6060(21)01180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.032.
    Publisher URL
    https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0039-6060(21)01180-6
    Note
    Supports Open Access
    Collections
    • 2022 RD&E publications
    • Colorectal Surgery
    • Gastroenterology

    Browse

    All of RD&E Research RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2022  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV