• Login
    View Item 
    •   RD&E Research Repository Home
    • All RD&E publications by year
    • pre-2014 RD&E publications
    • View Item
    •   RD&E Research Repository Home
    • All RD&E publications by year
    • pre-2014 RD&E publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Are the Peer Assessment Rating Index and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes?

    Thumbnail
    URI
    https://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/11287/622220
    Author
    Templeton, K. M.
    Powell, R.
    Moore, M. B.
    Williams, A. C.
    Sandy, J. R.
    Date
    2006-04-28
    Journal
    European Journal of Orthodontics
    Type
    Journal Article
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press
    DOI
    10.1093/ejo/cji120
    Rights
    © The Author 2006
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to determine which of two occlusal indices were the most appropriate for use in the assessment of orthognathic outcome. The indices used were the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and the Index of Treatment Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). These indices were validated against the subjective assessments of treatment outcome and treatment improvement obtained from a panel of experienced orthodontic consultants. For the subjective assessment, intraexaminer agreement for ranking treatment outcome, from patient study models (30 models), was good. Interexaminer agreement for ranking treatment outcome, in the same way, was good or moderate. Intraexaminer agreement for ranking treatment improvement (30 start and finish pairs of models) was very good or good. Interexaminer agreement for ranking treatment improvement ranged from good to fair. All the patient study models were scored using PAR and ICON. The level of correlation between PAR and ICON scores of treatment outcome and the subjective ranking of treatment outcome was significant (P < 0.001). The level of correlation between PAR and ICON scores of treatment improvement and the subjective ranking of treatment improvement was also significant (P < 0.001). It is concluded that both PAR and ICON are suitable indices for assessing the clinical outcome of combined orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery.
    Publisher URL
    https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ejo/cji120
    Note
    The article is available via Open Access. Click on the 'Additional link' above to access the full-text.
    Collections
    • Orthodontics, Oral & maxillofacial
    • pre-2014 RD&E publications

    Browse

    All of RD&E Research RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV