Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDonohoe, M. E.
dc.contributor.authorFletton, J. A.
dc.contributor.authorHook, A.
dc.contributor.authorPowell, R.
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, I.
dc.contributor.authorStead, J. W.
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, K.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, R.
dc.contributor.authorTooke, J. E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-12T11:39:55Z
dc.date.available2021-11-12T11:39:55Z
dc.date.issued2001-12-24
dc.identifier.pmid11073179
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00336.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/11287/622193
dc.description.abstractAIMS: To evaluate a model of integrated diabetic footcare, for identification and clinical management of the high risk diabetic foot, centred on the primary care-based diabetic annual review. METHODS: A pragmatic randomized controlled study was undertaken with matched cluster randomization of practices from 10 towns drawn from mid and east Devon responsible for the care of 1,939 people with diabetes (age > or =18 years). Outcome measures were patients' attitudes regarding the value and importance of footcare, patients' footcare knowledge, healthcare professionals' footcare knowledge and pattern of service utilization. RESULTS: Attitudes towards footcare improved in both intervention and control groups (mean percentage change 3.91, 0.68) with a significant difference in change of 3.18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-5.07) between the groups. Patients' knowledge about diabetic foot problems improved significantly in both groups (mean percentage change 1.09, 1.32) but with no significant difference in change: -0.09 (95% CI -1.81-1.63) between groups. Health professionals' knowledge scores improved in the intervention group (mean percentage change 13.2; P < 0.001). No improvement was seen in the control group (mean percentage change -0.2; P = 0.1) with a significant difference in change of 13.46 (95% CI 8.30-18.62) between groups. Appropriate referrals from intervention practices to the specialized foot clinic rose significantly (P = 0.05) compared with control practices (P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Provision of integrated care arrangements for the diabetic foot has a positive impact on primary care staffs' knowledge and patients' attitudes resulting in an increased number of appropriate referrals to acute specialist services.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rightsCopyright © 1999-2021 John Wiley & Sons,
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAttitude to Health
dc.subjectCosts and Cost Analysis
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus/physiopathology/psychology/*therapy
dc.subjectDiabetic Foot/economics/*prevention & control/*therapy
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge
dc.subjectAttitudes
dc.subjectPractice
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Models, Theoretical
dc.subject*Patient Education as Topic
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care/economics
dc.titleImproving foot care for people with diabetes mellitus--a randomized controlled trial of an integrated care approach
dc.typeClinical Trial
dc.identifier.journalDiabetic medicine
dc.description.noteRD&E staff can access the full-text of this article by clicking on the 'Additional Link' above and logging in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted.
dc.type.versionppublish
dc.description.admin-notePublished version, accepted version (12 month embargo), submitted version
dc.date.epub2000-11-10
dc.citation.volume17
dc.citation.issue8
dc.citation.spage581-7


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record