• Login
    View Item 
    •   RD&E Research Repository Home
    • All RD&E publications by year
    • 2020 RD&E publications
    • View Item
    •   RD&E Research Repository Home
    • All RD&E publications by year
    • 2020 RD&E publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Critical analysis of quality of life and cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patient's undergoing urologic oncology surgery: a systematic review

    Thumbnail
    URI
    https://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/11287/621600
    Author
    McGrath, John S
    Date
    2020-07-09
    Journal
    World Journal of Urology
    Type
    Journal Article
    Publisher
    Springer
    DOI
    10.1007/s00345-020-03341-6
    Rights
    Copyright © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented across a variety of disciplines to improve outcomes. Herein we describe the impact of ERAS on quality of life (QOL) and cost for patients undergoing urologic oncology surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Clinictrials.gov, and Cochrane Review databases for studies published between 1946 and 2020 was conducted. Articles were reviewed and assigned a risk of bias by two authors and were included if they addressed ERAS and either QOL or cost-effectiveness for patients undergoing urologic oncology surgery. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 682 studies after removing duplicates, of which 10 (1.5%) were included in the review. Nine articles addressed radical cystectomy, while one addressed ERAS and QOL for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Six publications assessed the impact of ERAS on QOL domains. Questionnaires used for assessment of QOL varied across studies, and timing of administration was heterogeneous. Overall, ERAS improved patient QOL during early phases of recovery within the realms of bowel function, physical/social/cognitive functioning, sleep and pain control. Costs were assessed in 4 retrospective studies including 3 conducted in the United States and one from China all addressing radical cystectomy. Studies demonstrated either decreased costs associated with ERAS as a result of decreased length of stay or no change in cost based on ERAS implementation. Conclusion: While limited studies are published on the subject, ERAS implementation for radical cystectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy improved patient-reported QOL during early phases of recovery. For radical cystectomy, there was a decreased or neutral overall financial cost associated with ERAS. Further studies assessing QOL and cost-effectiveness over the entire global period of care in a variety of urologic oncology surgeries are warranted.
    Citation
    Brooks NA et al. Critical analysis of quality of life and cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patient's undergoing urologic oncology surgery: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2020 Jul 9.
    Publisher URL
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03341-6
    Note
    This article is freely available to RD&E staff via NHS OpenAthens (subject to any publisher embargo). Click on the Publisher URL, and log in with NHS OpenAthens if prompted.
    Collections
    • 2020 RD&E publications
    • Urology

    Browse

    All of RD&E Research RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2021  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV