Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBullen, N
dc.contributor.authorMassey, L H
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, Stavros
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Neil J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T10:50:06Z
dc.date.available2019-09-30T10:50:06Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-03
dc.identifier.citationBullen NL [et al]. Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia. 2019 Jun 3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31161285
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://rde.dspace-express.com/handle/11287/621079
dc.description.abstractOne standard repair technique for groin hernias does not exist. The objective of this study is to perform an update meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to investigate if there is a difference in terms of recurrence between laparoscopic and open primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia repair.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7en_US
dc.subjectWessex Classification Subject Headings::Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleOpen versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.typeSystematic reviewen_US
dc.identifier.journalHerniaen_US
dc.type.versionIn press (epub ahead of print)en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record