Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGosling, Oliver E.en
dc.contributor.authorMorgan-Hughes, G.en
dc.contributor.authorBellenger, Nick G.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-19T12:35:05Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-19T12:35:05Zen
dc.date.issued2014-10-01en
dc.identifier.citationClin Med. 2014 Oct;14(5):475-81.en
dc.identifier.issn1470-2118en
dc.identifier.pmid25301906en
dc.identifier.doi10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-475en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/593801en
dc.description.abstractSymptomatic cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of hospital admissions in the UK; along with emergency attendances, over 100,000 patients are investigated using treadmill testing via rapid access chest pain clinics each year. With the introduction of new technologies, clinicians have a wide choice of investigations including nuclear perfusion scanning, dobutamine stress echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. These imaging modalities have their strengths and weaknesses, which depend not only on the pre-test likelihood of significant coronary artery disease but also the clinical characteristics of the patient. This article will review the differing imaging modalities, the patient experience, accuracy, prognostic data and future prospects for cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherClin Meden
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25301906en
dc.titleCardiac imaging to investigate suspected cardiac pain in the post-treadmill eraen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journalClinical medicineen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record