Orthodontics, Oral & maxillofacial

Permanent URI for this collection

Research outputs from the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery team at the RD&E.


Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 5 of 28
  • Item
    How does diabetes mellitus impact on the prognosis of dental implants?
    (Springer Nature, 2023-08-01) Baniulyte, G.; Ali, K.
    DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for publications up to August 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The study noted clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. Search terms were provided; only observational studies were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A total of 122 studies were identified through the search strategy. Following deduplication, two reviewers conducted the screening. RESULTS: A total of 21 observational studies were included, involving cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional study designs. A meta-analysis identified increased risk of peri-implantitis in patients with diabetes mellitus and in smokers when compared to non-diabetic subjects and non-smokers. No significant association was found between poor plaque control or periodontal history and peri-implantitis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes mellitus appear to have a higher risk of peri-implantitis.
  • Item
    Vital role of clinicians in reducing the NHS carbon footprint through smarter procurement decisions
    (BMJ Publishing Group, 2023-08-01) Al-Hadithy, N.; Knight, K.; Gopfert, A.; Van Hove, M.; Villa Garcia, X.
    BACKGROUND: The NHS' impact on the environment is significant, accounting for 5.9% of the national carbon footprint of the UK and 20 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO(2)e) emissions a year.The procurement of goods and services is responsible for 72% of the NHS carbon footprint-equivalent to 15.2Mt CO(2)e. Procurement is, therefore, a priority focus area to consider, if carbon reductions are to be made. The impact of procurement decisions extends over the 'whole life'-from identification of the need for a product or service through to the provision of the product or service and including the product's 'end of life' process (disposal).From April this year, any new procurement needs to have a 10% net zero and social value weighting. From April 2023 onward, any new procurement two times per day should incorporate carbon footprint and environmental impact.This paper aims to introduce clinicians to the concept of green procurement and illustrate the potential greenhouse gases savings possible if procurement decisions were informed by the sustainability credentials such as the carbon footprint of a product or the corporate social responsibility programme of the supplier. METHODS: While seconded at the Department of Health and Social Care, the senior author on this paper collaborated with the NHS Supply Chain to pilot carbon footprinting of one clinical item. We chose to focus on the 20-gauge 'pink' cannula as a high-volume familiar article; 25 million cannulas are purchased via the NHS Supply Chain each year, of which the most commonly used size is the 20 gauge. RESULTS: Of the seven companies approached, five sent us their CSR strategies. Four companies provided product primary data, and of these four, one provided sufficient data to carry out a carbon footprint analysis. The one set of detailed data provided was for two 20-gauge cannulas, 1 with wings and 1 without. The total carbon footprint for Cannula 1 is 33.92 g CO(2)e. The total carbon footprint for Cannula 2 is 35.45 g CO(2)e. This amounts to a 1.54 g CO(2)e difference between the 2 cannulas. CONCLUSION: It is both necessary and possible for the NHS to demonstrate leadership in reducing the carbon footprint of healthcare.We have provided an overview of NHS procurement to empower clinicians to get involved with local and national decision-making. We have demonstrated the potential carbon savings that could be made through careful choice of products. We have also highlighted the risks if clinicians do not engage with green procurement.
  • Item
    Do e-cigarettes have a part to play in peri-implant diseases?
    (Springer Nature, 2023-03-01) Baniulyte, G.; Ali, K.
    DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched for publications up to May 2022: Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, Cochrane and Open Grey. Additionally, four journals were hand searched. STUDY SELECTION: Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria were provided. A focused question was outlined using PICO format. A full search protocol was supplied, and all study designs were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers screened 97 articles after de-duplication. Fourteen full-text articles were assessed. Data were collected using a spreadsheet. RESULTS: Four cross-sectional studies were included in the systematic review, all reporting on male participants. Meta-analysis was performed highlighting worse outcomes in electronic cigarette (e- cigarette) user group regarding increased bone loss, probing depth, plaque index and bleeding on probing, as well as increased levels of inflammatory cytokines, when compared to never-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: From the limited number of studies available, e-cigarettes appear to have a negative impact on dental implant outcomes in male patients.
  • Item
    The Changing Face of Head and Neck Cancer; How the Head and Neck One-Stop Clinic Has Evolved Since Conception
    (Springer, 2022-12-01) Campbell, E.; Huston, M.; Collard, B.
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the patient journey through the head and neck clinic across 13 years of service improvement. We aimed to compare pick-up rates of cancer; number of patients receiving tissue diagnoses at first visit; and number of patients who were discharged on their first visit. METHODS: In the one-stop head and neck cancer clinic, the demographic data, investigations and outcomes for 277 patients who attended in 2004 were compared to those of 205 patients who attended in 2017. The number of patients receiving ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology was compared. Patient outcomes were analysed: specifically, the number discharged on first visit and the number of malignancies diagnosed. RESULTS: The pick-up rate for malignancy from 2004 to 2017 has remained stable (17.3% vs 17.1%). The number of patients receiving ultrasound has remained stable from 264 (95%) in 2004 to 191 (93%) in 2017. The number undergoing FNA has decreased from 139 (50%) to 68 (33%) (p < 0.01). The number of patient's discharged on the first visit has significantly increased from 82 (30%) in 2004 to 89 (43%) in 2017 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The one-stop clinic provides an effective and efficient means of head and neck lump assessment. Since inception of this service, the accuracy of diagnostic investigation has improved over time.
  • Item
    Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in patients aged over 65 years : a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes and complications
    (British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Journal, 2022-08-03) Burden, E. G.; Batten, T.; Smith, C.; Evans, J. P.
    AIMS: Arthroplasty is being increasingly used for the management of distal humeral fractures (DHFs) in elderly patients. Arthroplasty options include total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA); both have unique complications and there is not yet a consensus on which implant is superior. This systematic review asked: in patients aged over 65 years with unreconstructable DHFs, what differences are there in outcomes, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), and complications, between distal humeral HA and TEA? METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on PROMs, ROM, and complications. PROMs and ROM results were reported descriptively and a meta-analysis of complications was conducted. Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde's non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021228329). RESULTS: A total of 29 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score was 19.6 (SD 7.5) for HA and 38 (SD 11.9) for TEA and the mean abbreviated version of DASH was 17.2 (SD 13.2) for HA and 24.9 (SD 4.8) for TEA. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was the most commonly reported PROM across included studies, with a mean of 87 (SD 5.3) in HA and 88.3 (SD 5) in TEA. High complication rates were seen in both HA (22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5 to 44)) and TEA (21% (95% CI 13 to 30), but no statistically significant difference identified. CONCLUSION: This systematic review has indicated PROMs and ROM mostly favouring HA, but with a similarly high complication rate in the two procedures. However, due to the small sample size and heterogeneity between studies, strength of evidence for these findings is low. We propose further research in the form of a national randomized controlled trial. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):559-566.